The Council of Governors to Rule The United States!

Submitted by SadInAmerica on Thu, 09/19/2013 - 12:12pm.


The Council of Governors has actually been a while in the making. It originally started when, back in the sixties, the United Nations issued an order that the United States must 're-organize' into ten regions. Super regions, was the exact phrasing, and one can only assume that the purpose was to make controlling governing the United States easier.

President Nixon, in spite of the fact that the United Nations has no power in the United States, complied with the United Nations directive and signed  Executive Order 11647 dividing the United States into ten regions.

One should note that an executive order has no power outside the legislative branch, no matter what Obama says.

Speaking of Obama, on January 11, 2010, he established the Council of Governors for the ten regions Executive Order 13528. These are ten people put in place, supposedly help the federal government and the state governments to get along.

The fact is, however, this council of ten could be used to ignore state governments, and implement whatever cockamamie political skullduggery they wish.

You see, the ten governors are in collusion with Homeland Security, Northcom, the National Guard, and the DOD. One might well ask why these bureaus are interested not in seeking terrorists, but in laying out plans to organize and govern the people of the United States?

The actual language refers to "synchronization and integration of State and Federal military activities in the United States."

Military activities in the United States? What military activities? Why are we having military activities when there is no revolt? WTF is going on?

To further complicate the matter, there are ten social security regions in the United States, 10 IRS centers, 10 FEMA regions.

Now, whether there is direct connection or not between these agencies and the Council of Governors, it is obvious that they can be brought together at a moment's notice.

It is also obvious that this is a plan in the making. There are no reasons for a Council of Governors, but Presidents for the last 40 years have been contributing, through action or inaction, to a plan to rule a United States where there are no states.

The only real question here is what is going to be done about this Council of Governors?


August 22, 2013 - posted at TheDailyNeutron




By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1822 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-181), and in order to strengthen further the partnership between the Federal Government and State governments to protect our Nation and its people and property, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Council of Governors.

(a) There is established a Council of Governors (Council).The Council shall consist of 10 State Governors appointed by the President (Members), of whom no more than five shall be of the same political party. The term of service for each Member appointed to serve on the Council shall be 2 years, but a Member may be reappointed for additional terms.

(b) The President shall designate two Members, who shall not be members of the same political party, to serve as Co-Chairs of the Council.

Sec. 2. Functions.

The Council shall meet at the call of the Secretary of Defense or the Co-Chairs of the Council to exchange views, information, or advice with the Secretary of Defense; the Secretary of Homeland Security; the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counter-terrorism; the Assistant to the President for Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Engagement; the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and Americas' Security Affairs; the Commander,United States Northern Command; the Chief, National Guard Bureau; the Commandant of the Coast Guard; and other appropriate officials of the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Defense, and appropriate officials of other executive departments or agencies as may be designated by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of Homeland Security. Such views, information, or advice shall concern:

(a) matters involving the National Guard of the various States;

(b) homeland defense;

(c) civil support;

(d) synchronization and integration of State and Federal military activities in the United States; and

(e) other matters of mutual interest pertaining to National Guard, homeland defense, and civil support activities.

Sec. 3. Administration.

(a) The Secretary of Defense shall designate an Executive Director to coordinate the work of the Council.

(b) Members shall serve without compensation for their work on the Council. However, Members shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, as authorized by law.

(c) Upon the joint request of the Co-Chairs of the Council, the Secretary of Defense shall, to the extent permitted by law and subject to the availability of appropriations, provide the Council with administrative support,assignment or detail of personnel, and information as may be necessary for the performance of the Council's functions.

(d) The Council may establish subcommittees of the Council. These subcommittees shall consist exclusively of Members of the Council and any designated employees of a Member with authority to act on the Member's behalf, as appropriate to aid the Council in carrying out its functions under this order.

(e) The Council may establish a charter that is consistent with the terms of this order to refine further its purpose,scope, and objectives and to allocate duties, as appropriate,among members.

Sec. 4. Definitions. As used in this order:

(a) the term "State" has the meaning provided in paragraph (15) of section 2 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 101 (15)); and

(b) the term "Governor" has the meaning provided in paragraph (5) of section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122 (5)).

Sec. 5. General Provisions.

(a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

      (1) the authority granted by law to a department, agency, or the head thereof; or

      (2) functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary,administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.


January 11, 2010.


Tag this page!
Submitted by SadInAmerica on Thu, 09/19/2013 - 12:12pm.