The Case For Impeachment

Submitted by SadInAmerica on Mon, 05/13/2013 - 11:42pm.


In Article II, Section 4, of the U.S. Constitution states, "The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors." ~ Dave Hodges - Video - related article

The U.S. House of Representatives has the power to commence impeachment proceedings. If the House adopts an impeachment resolution, the U.S. Senate conducts a trial and determines whether to convict or acquit.

If an official is convicted, he or she is removed from the position and may be barred from holding office again. The official may also face criminal prosecution.

Obama Is Ineligible to Hold the Office of the Presidency

obama declared fraud by arpaio

Investigators for an Arizona sheriff's volunteer posse, under the command of Sheriff Joe Arpaio, previously declared that President Barack Obama's birth certificate is definitely fraudulent.

In short, Obama should never have been permitted to run for the highest office in the land.

Regardless if Obama's conduct is warrants impeachment and conviction, he should never have been allowed to run for the presidency and the allegations against him should be a moot point with regard to his potential impeachment.




Obama's reckless and criminal actions have led to the slaughter of countless numbers of civilians in Afghanistan.

Despite claims to the contrary which stated that the Obama commanded forces which only deployed U.S. drones exclusively against known senior leaders of al Qaeda and their allies.

The Obama administration has targeted and killed hundreds of suspected lower-level Afghan, Pakistani and unidentified "other" militants in scores of strikes in Pakistan's according to classified U.S. intelligence reports show.

According to McClatchy's review of drone strikes and found that the Obama administration, in 43 of 95 studied drone strikes, hit groups other than al Qaeda.

Obama has not only brought discredit to the reputation of the United States, Obama has proven himself to be a war criminal and should not only be impeached, but should be brought to justice by an international tribunal along with fellow war criminal George W. Bush.


fast and syrious

Obama has illegally participated in the overthrow of the sovereign government of Libya without a declaration of war from Congress. In the process Libyan "rebels" toppled Gadaffi.

We now know that in the process of arming the rebels, Obama was actually arming al-Qaeda. History is repeating itself in Syria as Obama, again, is arming al-Qaeda in an attempt to topple Assad of Syria.

If we do indeed hold al-Qaeda responsible for 9/11, as a government, isn't the arming of al-Qaeda an act of treason because he is overtly providing aid and comfort to the enemy? President Obama is guilty of treason which is a high crime under the Constitution.

The Murder of Chris Stevens

Obama was warned in advance of the coming attack in which Stevens begged for more protection and his impassioned pleas were denied by Clinton. Clinton is unquestionably dirty in the death of Ambassador Stevens.

However, the buck stops with Obama. He likely gave the stand down order, but he certainly must take responsibility for Clinton's multiple refusals to protect an Ambassador.

As Stevens was begging for help after the attack had begun, AFRICOM Commander, General Hamm, had activated a special forces team within minutes of learning that the embassy, which was really a CIA safe house, was under attack.

On the orders of the White House, Hamm was arrested and relieved of command and the rescue mission was cancelled.

We now know from the Hicks testimony, that there were weaponized drones flying overhead which could have stopped the attack on the compound. This means that there were three separate ways that Stevens could have been saved and Obama's Murder Inc. blocked all potential rescue attempts

Obama later claimed that there was not time to launch a rescue mission. This is a blatant lie because if a drone can reach the scene and video the events, fighter planes could also have reached the scene and intervened and then this could have been followed up by a rapid deployment force trained in rescue.

Execution of American Citizens Without Due Process of Law

Since 2009, Obama's minions, through aerial assaults also have killed three U.S. citizens as well as countless of innocent civilians in both Pakistan and Afghanistan. Obama's actions begs the question as to whether the president has the right to order the death of Americans without due process of law.

Attorney General, Eric Holder, has stated that does but would not do so. The intent behind Holder's proclamation is self-evident.

One of those controversial and well publicized drone attacks involved the killing of Anwar al-Awalki. He was an American citizen and, at the same time, a radical Muslim cleric who had relocated his family to Yemen.

He was rumored to be involved in repeated attempts to attack the U.S., including the Christmas day underwear bomber plot in 2009 that would have blown up a passenger jet over Detroit.

The murder of Anwar al-Awalki was committed without any due process of law.

Also killed as the result of a drone attack was American citizen, Samir Khan. He was the editor of "Inspire," an alleged al Qaeda 's online magazine. Kahn was never accused of participating in, or being involved with the planning of any terrorist activity.

Since when has it been a criminal offense to be involved in al Qaeda, since we used their assets to attack Libya and have involved members of this organization in trying overthrow Syria's Assad.

drone killing

Two weeks later, after the death of his father, in a separate drone attack, al-Awalki's 16-year-old son, who was born in Denver was also murdered by a drone. If these three individuals were involved in terrorist activity, then they should have been arrested and tried for their crimes.

Instead, our communist-in-chief, decides on his own authority to murder these three Americans without any due process of law.

Obama's actions in these three cases brings to a total of four murders that we know that Obama had carried out at his behest. In a Republic, it is unacceptable to continue to allow such a murderous despot continue to run this country.


I maintain that if Obama is only guilty of one of the aforementioned allegations, he should be impeached, convicted and immediately removed from office. He, in fact, is guilty of all charges set forth here. The fate of the Republic hinges on Obama's impeachment and conviction.

impeach obama2

It is highly probable that Obama is directly responsible for the murder of Chris Stevens, yet nobody in Congress has the intestinal fortitude to thoroughly investigate. In fact, John McCain has already said that he will not back impeachment against Obama.

The Republicans will only push so far because they do not want their own skeletons to be exposed. Case in point has to do with the Fast and Furious that Obama got caught in terms of running guns into Mexico so they could blame the Second Amendment.

Republican Issa was hot on Holder's trail until he found that Fast and Furious was originated under George W. Bush and that was the end of the investigation. We cannot let the Benghazi scandal to suffer the same fate as Fast and Furious.

This is most likely a case of first degree murder. At minimum, Obama is obviously guilty of gross misconduct, malfeasance and criminally negligent homicide. Not only should Obama be impeached and convicted, he should criminally convicted and sentenced to prison.

Crimes Against Humanity

Only two American presidents have been impeached by the House of Representatives and they were Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton. The Senate failed to convict both presidents. A third President, Richard Nixon, resigned over the Watergate scandal before the House of Representatives had voted on his impeachment.

If Clinton was subsequently impeached by the House for lying about his affair with Monica Lewinsky. However, the Lewinsky affair was a smokescreen as Obama committed war crimes through his bombing of Afghanistan and Iraq.

In the following video, Ron Paul, in 1998, made the case for impeaching Bill Clinton for gross violations of the Constitution and committing war crimes by bombing Iraq without congressional approval. Ralph Nader weighs in with a stunning indictment of Obama's criminality.


Dave Hodges - May 13, 2013 - posted at TheCommonSenseShow


Related article...

One Hundred Articles of Impeachment Against Obama


Tag this page!
Submitted by SadInAmerica on Mon, 05/13/2013 - 11:42pm.