Okay, So Where Did the Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich Votes Go?.... Where Paper Prevailed, Different Results!

Submitted by SadInAmerica on Fri, 01/11/2008 - 2:59pm.

Have the voters of the United States lost their way?  Has the new and improved method of vote fraud now been accepted as a normal part of the presidential election process?  Wake up America!  This is the most important election in the history of our country!  Carefully look at the voting results from New Hampshire.  Compare the hand counted votes against the Diebold counted results.... This is clearly a setup as was Hillary's whimpering episode the day before the primary election.  She was desparate, playing for sympathy votes!  I refuse to believe the brilliant NH voters fell for this crap!   We want to know what you think, post your comments!..... by SadInAmerica

NH: "First in the nation" (with corporate controlled secret vote counting) By Nancy Tobi 07 Jan 2008.....  81% of New Hampshire ballots are counted in secret by a private corporation named Diebold Election Systems (now known as "Premier"). The elections run on these machines are programmed by one company, LHS Associates, based in Methuen, MA. We know nothing about the people programming these machines, and we know even less about LHS Associates. We know even less about the secret vote counting software used to tabulate 81% of our ballots. [See also CLG's Coup 2004 and Yes, Gore DID win!.]

2008 New Hampshire Democratic Primary Results

Total Democratic Votes: 287,580 - Machine vs Hand (RonRox.com) 09 Jan 2008
Hillary Clinton, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 40.121%

Clinton, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 34.703%

Barack Obama, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 35.756%
Obama, Hand Counted Paper Ballots:
38.785%
Machine vs Hand:

Clinton: 5.419% (15,584 votes)

Obama: -3.029% (-8,711 votes)

2008 New Hampshire Republican Primary Results

Total Republican Votes: 238,909 Machine vs Hand (RonRox.com) 09 Jan 2008
Mitt Romney, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 33.044%

Romney, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 25.536%

Ron Paul, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 7.233%
Paul, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 9.235%
Machine vs Hand:
Romney: 7.509% (17,939 votes)
Paul: -2.112% (-4,781 votes)

The numbers you report in "Where Paper Prevailed, Different Results" (1/9/08) certainly merit further investigation. The next step would be to get standard deviations and do a simple difference of means test. This would tell the probability that these results could have occurred by chance. --CLG reader Brian D'Agostino, Ph.D., New York, NY

The difference between results from hand-counting and machine-counting do not necessarily signify that the machine-counting is wrong. Other factors may be involved. For example, voting machines may have been used in wealthier, more moderate neighborhoods. There may not be a causal connection between machine-counted ballots and differing totals. One cannot assume that machines are necessarily wrong while hand-counting is necessarily right. --Michael Rectenwald

by Lori Price  www.legitgov.org

Tag this page!
Submitted by SadInAmerica on Fri, 01/11/2008 - 2:59pm.

Comments

Anonymous (not verified) | Mon, 01/14/2008 - 6:54pm

Its very sad to see the people of this great nation be fooled into enslaving themself for the people who secretly rule the word..i am an 18 year old black male who has not had higher learning but i am glad i see the truth ..vote Ron Paul !!!