EXCLUSIVE... 9/11, What's Wrong With This Picture?

Submitted by Jonathan on Sat, 12/20/2008 - 12:45am.

KnowTheLies has reviewed the content herein and agrees the author, Robert Singer, has presented a new and different perspective on the events of 9/11.

And finally a warning from President Bush, "Let us never tolerate
outrageous conspiracy theories" aired on national television after the
attacks of 9/11 and right before the Patriot Act was forced down Congress.
Super misinformation.
Google "9/11 conspiracy" and you get 134,000,000 results.
Google "9/11 outrageous conspiracy" you get 556,000 results.
There is a 9/11-truth movement in every major city in the United States.
9/11 conspiracy theories are allowed and even encouraged. Could the 9/11
Truth movement be the cover for another story?

Many official government stories are so ridiculous that a select group of people some call the puppet masters don't expect you to believe them. Disinformation is misleading information that is true, deliberately announced publicly or leaked by a government or an intelligence agency to sow confusion and undermine credibility. Misinformation is false or inaccurate information, which is deliberately intended to deceive.

September 11, 2001:

According to the government on 9/11, 19 fanatical Arab hijackers, masterminded by an evil genius named Osama bin Laden, crash airplanes into steel skyscrapers because they "hate our freedom to consume" and for the first time in history three buildings collapse at free fall speed due to a jet fuel fire. Jet fuel, which is basically kerosene that burns at about 400c, on 9/11 took on the qualities of an explosive demolition agent, vaporizing 70 tons of aircraft into a puff of smoke and causing 110-story buildings to collapse into a pile of rubble. Misinformation?

Yes, millions believe at least a LIHOP (Let It Happen on Purpose) version of the story because a MIHOP (Made It Happen on Purpose) version results in cognitive dissonance. Cognitive dissonance is the discomfort felt when one realizes 3,000 American citizens died to build up the military, pass the Patriot Act, justify the invasion of Afghanistan, Iraq and, of course, FISA--the White House's warrantless wiretapping on Americans suspected of links to terrorists.

Anyone not in denial and offered an alternate explanation needs a New York minute to realize the official story is absurd, and that is before they find out the military was conducting Operation Vigilant Guardian, an exercise on 9/11 simulating hijacked planes in the NE sector of the United States crashing into skyscrapers. The government describes the coincidence of terrorists actually hijacking planes and flying them into the World Trade Center as just one of those "bizarre coincidences," those little quirks of fate that do happen from time to time, like the same person winning the lottery three weeks in a row. The odds are astronomical, but these things happen.

There were other bizarre coincidences on 9/11, take World Trade Center 7. Never heard of WTC 7? That isn't surprising because, although slick science TV programs "explained" the collapses of the Twin Towers, the 7-second collapse of Building 7 remains virtually unknown probably because it wasn't hit by a plane. Chapter 5 of the FEMA World Trade Center Building Performance Study states: "WTC 7 is of significant interest because it appears the collapse was due primarily to fire, rather than any impact damage from the collapsing towers."

FEMA admits there is no proof a fire caused the collapse of Building 7, and the final chapter (5.8), instead of offering conclusions offers "Recommendations": "Certain issues should be explored before final conclusions are reached and additional studies of the performance of WTC 7, and related building performance issues should be conducted," as well as "suggested mechanisms for a progressive collapse should be studied and confirmed," and "how the collapse of an unknown number of gravity columns brought down the whole building must be explained." The report does not mention WTC 7 was home to Giuliani's Secret Command Center and the Securities and Exchange Commission. Enron, WorldCom and 3 to 4,000 other companies won the lottery when the collapse of Building 7 destroyed their SEC case files.

And then the Penta-gone:

According to Jamie Mcintryre, CNN correspondent at the scene "From my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. And as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon." This report is disinformation deliberately announced publicly in order to influence public opinion.

The attack targeted the portion of the building opposite the offices of Secretary of Defense. Instead of attacking Rumsfeld's offices, the jet executed a 320-degree descending spiral to its east, south, and southwest, losing seven thousand feet before making its final approach from the southwest hitting the portion of the Pentagon just renovated and occupied by its newest tenant, The Office of Naval Intelligence. Thirty-four of those killed were civilian accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts.

Just the day before, on September 10, 2001, Donald Rumsfeld was speaking to Congress and confessed the Pentagon is missing 2.3 trillion Dollars. Just vanished. And, in another one of those things that don't happen very often, The Office of Naval Intelligence was investigating the missing 2.3 trillion.

In June 2006, Muckraker Report investigative reporter Ed Haas contacted the FBI to ask why 9/11 was not specifically mentioned on Bin Laden's wanted page on the FBI website. According to the FBI "The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama Bin Laden's most wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11." But according to George W. Bush, the 2003 invasion of Iraq was required because Iraq had weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and a connection to 9/11--and don't forget Bush wanted to free the Iraqi people.

Recently, the Bush Administration has admitted there were no WMDs and Saddam Hussein had no ties to the attacks on 9/11. Enter Valerie Plame, the Spy Who Got Shoved Out Into the Cold.

The Plame leak was a breach of national security and a violation of law under the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982. One could "predict that the investigation" of Bush and Cheney would die in the CIA as George J. Tenet would stay loyal to Bush. But instead, in another one of those strange quirks of fate, Mr. Tenet decided to do "the right thing" and investigate the scandal - ad nauseaum. The story was in the news until 2007 and Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald during the investigation commented, "As you sit back, you want to learn why was this information going out. Why were people taking this information about Valerie Wilson and giving it to reporters?" Answer? Disinformation. Instead of organizing an elaborate PR campaign to disparage Wilson, Cheney could have directed the CIA to hide a few WMDs prior to the invasion. "We found them, he had them, look, here they are, Bush and Cheney were telling the truth."

And finally a warning from President Bush, "Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories" aired on national television after the attacks of 9/11 and right before the Patriot Act was forced down Congress. Super misinformation. Evidentially David Ray Griffin was not watching television on 9/11. A philosopher at the Claremont School of Theology, Griffin scrutinizes the timeline and physical evidence of September 11 for unresolved inconsistencies in his widely read book "New Pearl Harbor". Griffin draws heavily on The Big Lie--a bestseller in France. He claims that if standard procedures for scrambling fighter jets had been followed, the hijacked planes should have been intercepted in time, and that, structurally, the collapse of the World Trade Center towers most likely was caused by explosives placed throughout the towers, not from the plane crashes.

Amazon Customers who searched for or bought New Pearl Harbor or expressed interest in "This Item" can find 17 pages of related titles all by authors who missed the President's warning.

Don't want to read about 9/11? How about a movie? Here are just a few amateur selections: 9/11, Eyewitness Hoboken, Great Illusion, Painful Deceptions, Mysteries, Greatest Lie Ever Sold. Google Video has 6 pages of related 9/11 videos.

However, without a doubt the Oscar winner for Best Documentary is "Loose Change" (2005, 2006, 2007). A series of documentaries that assert the September 11, 2001 attacks were planned and conducted by elements within the United States government and base the claims on perceived anomalies in the historical record of the attacks. Loose Change is one of the most downloaded movies on the Internet and was featured on a New York local FOX affiliate, WICZ-TV. Watching it you would assume Oliver Stone was the director, not two college students Dylan Avery & Jason Bermas who allegedly made it by "accident."

Google "9/11 conspiracy" and you get 134,000,000 results.
Google "9/11 outrageous conspiracy" you get 556,000 results.
There is a 9/11-truth movement in every major city in the United States.
9/11 conspiracy theories are allowed and even encouraged. Could the 9/11 Truth movement be the cover for another story?

Robert Singer - December 13, 2008 - Exclusive to KnowTheLies

Other great articles by Robert Singer can be found here:

Silver, But No Silver Lining
Washington and Poland just moved the World closer to War - Unlikely
"Give Us the ANWAR and Keep Shopping" - They Found They Can't Have Both
"I had a dream" Barack Obama was elected the 44th President of the United States

Authors Bio: Robert Singer is a retired information technology professional and an environmental activist living in southern California. In 1995 he and his cousin Adam D. Singer founded IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc., where he served as chief technology officer. Today the company manages more than 130 practice groups, providing care in some 300 medical facilities in 18 states. Prior to that he was president of Useful Software, a developer and publisher of business and consumer software for the personal computing Industry.

Tag this page!
Submitted by Jonathan on Sat, 12/20/2008 - 12:45am.


Justin Thought (not verified) | Sat, 07/25/2009 - 11:05pm

LIHOP, MIHOP, whichever it was, IDHOP! (It Did Happen On Purpose).

And if you can't quite wrap your arms around "19 terrorists etc.", that means that they DIDN'T do it. And that means someone else did it.

There's the starting point.

And if you CAN wrap your arms around "19 terrorists etc.", you need to read a little more, as well as cut down on (1) fluoride, (2) fast food (with some nice little additives), (3) Television, (4) psychotropic drugs, or any of the other things that might make you unable to think.

Start with Loose Change.

Tom Dennen (not verified) | Mon, 02/02/2009 - 3:22am

The whole world is operating on the cumulative thinking of mostly dead men.

And all of that thinking came from their contemporaries - philosophies; religious or otherwise that accumulated over the centuries in their particular environments.

But because very little of that thinking could see far enough into the future (the Mayan Indian’s Calendar et al notwithstanding), the past has finally caught up to us with the fairly predictable, mundane and mechanical situation we now find ourselves in principally in the Capitalist western world: the demise of legal theft through usury over time.

But, as traditional Islam would have it, “write it off.”

Or as Christians would have it, “forgive us our sins.”


It is our time to be alive.

And we are all of us alive at this moment in history with a huge opportunity:

We have to reinvent the meaning of our collective lives.

Across the board.

This time, the time of our collective existence on this planet is also the only time we have to totally reinvent ourselves as human beings.

It is more than obvious today that the basic teachings underpinning all religions need to be reexamined by all their practitioners and brought back into the one path that we all agree on:

Love one another.

Not an unfamiliar concept, is it?

It’s just that none of us practice it.

Why not?

Short term sociologically blinkered benefits, usually, selfishness, greed and the loss of respect for Nature..

Is it not time to learn from our history?

Or are we bent on our own destruction because we cannot see – or look – further than the gratification of our own skin encapsulated egos?

Anonymous (not verified) | Sun, 01/25/2009 - 4:58am

There are MANY layers to 9/11 and why it happened. Whenever they do stuff like this, they make sure to include as many win wins as they can. I am not going to go into all of them.

The MAIN reason 9/11 was done the way it was is simple. To discredit the USA and its government. Doing so will make it that much easier for the american people to swallow the American Union and all that entails. In fact it will make them want something new. Obama is just there to finish it off. Everyone knows that the US government is so corrupt that it can never be fixed. The only thing that can be done is get rid of it.

The people who funded and carried out this operation KNEW they would eventually be found out. That was the plan all along. To get caught.

And once they are completely caught, the people who will prosecute them will be seen as true leaders and will be followed anywhere they wish to go, including one world government.

That is the end goal. Everything else is just a bad B movie with even worse actors.

Robert Singer (not verified) | Wed, 01/28/2009 - 2:26am

Watch your back, ladies and gentlemen, there are some people with creepy agendas in the 911 Truth Movement, movers & shakers, and people with money.

So, you say you want to help expose 911 because you think it's the crime that will wake people in the U.S.A. up? Make them, in some vague way, rise up against it all?

Previously on this website, I've cautioned that just because someone wears a 911 Truth Movement hat and identifies themselves as working for the cause doesn't mean they really want 911 truth exposed as their actions and their words may belie that label if you look close enough. And although there are more examples of that all the time, in this piece, I'm cautioning you about something different, to realize that just because someone wears a 911 Truth Movement hat AND may want the 911 truth exposed, doesn't mean they want it exposed for "good" reasons. (It's possible you could want it exposed and still be a bad guy.) We need to know what some might have up their sleeves if what we all hope for comes true, that we succeed in getting the 911 truth exposed. In this way, we are preparing for success, preparing for the next step in the process, the process, yes, of solving the ills of the masses of humanity, by also preparing ourselves to combat the next steps of those whose solutions we feel would cause harm and who have a leg up on us in their planning.

Of course, there are many in the movement whose only agenda is to tar Bush and the rest of his Republican administration, the 'anybody but Bushies', who want nothing more than a superficial changing of the guard even though manufactured terror is nothing new to Democratic Presidential Administrations and even though the attacks must have been planned pre-Bush, see http://mysite.verizon.net/vze25x9n/id23.html. It's disheartening to see so many clueless. It's as if some people just started reading the newspaper or looked outside themselves beginning in 2001.

And there are those who use 9-11 seeking to advance an anti-Semitic agenda. I've never in my life come across so much anti-Semitic material as when I joined the 911 Truth Movement, and sad to say, it comes from those I would otherwise term most militant in the movement.

Common too is the pointing, by people who should know better that the evidence demonstrates 9-11 was an inside job, at countries other than the u.s. as being the true culprits, creating motivations for the u.s. to attack other countries. Think Michael Moore and the Saudis; or Pakistan and Paul Thompson, whose timeline based solely on mainstream corporate news reporting (you know, what we've all learned to trust so much :-) has just been released in book form. "Paul says either the US government was directly involved with Pakistan and other countries in the 9-11 plot and allowed it to happen or helped it to happen, or the US government was taken for fools and afterwards covered up their foolishness" http://www.snowshoefilms.com/911coverup.html. Here's to hoping that ridiculous conclusion isn't published in the Thompson Timeline book, which I've just purchased but haven't yet read.

A quick aside - I note with distress that the forward to Thompson's celebrated 590 page book was written by Peter Lance who is also making the rounds at 9-11 truth movement events himself, pushing his own new Terror Cover Up book. Here's an excerpt from an interview with Lance promoting his own new book: "Lance doesn't subscribe to the notion that U.S. authorities intentionally allowed the 9/11 attack to occur in order to justify the Bush administration's new, aggressively unilateral approach to world affairs, explaining, "I'm not some conspiracy guy, I'm a hard-bitten journalist." Instead, he attributes the cover-up to the oldest motivation in the book - covering one's ass . . . [over] screw ups". http://www.independent.com/news/news928.htm And sad to say, here is Paul Thompson in his book's introduction, speaking not of governmental complicity or of an inside-job, but of failures: "Who in our government failed in their constitutional duty to 'protect and defend' us from these attacks? And how can we ensure that such failures will not occur again? We must find answers to these questions. The United States will remain vulnerable - we are not safe and we will not be safe - until we can answer these questions, until we can call to account those who have failed us, and until we repair institutional dysfunctions that contributed to this failure." Simply outrageous!!

There's also been another possible motive for the 9-11 attacks that I've speculated about since the beginning. Have you ever wondered why the 9-11 official story was so implausible and so sloppily put together? (you know, the simultaneous hijacking of four different planes by people armed with mere boxcutters, the suicide notes found in luggage that inadvertently didn't make it on the planes, Arabic flight manuals left in cars in the airport, and a million other things they did which seem like obvious plants, or things they didn't do or create which would have squelched many of the 9-11 skeptics early on.) It's as if they want us to see through the whole thing. Could the perpetrators, in fact, want a 911 Truth Movement to flourish? And if so, why?

Perhaps the perpetrators are deliberately setting up the U.S. to be the bad guy to the rest of the world, perhaps to give the rest of the world the notion that they'd have to consolidate to fight the sole superpower, getting us that much closer to a one world government that so many global elite long for. Perhaps the 'transparent 9-11 inside job/ mass murder deliberately painted on others for a non-ending war pretext' is just a part of that, part of the intentional plotting to have the U.S. be seen as the real rogue nation that others must get together to fight against.

Everywhere you look, it seems, the U.S. goes out of its way, against its interests, to put itself in the worst possible light. The U.S. could easily have, for example, planted weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to make itself look better, but it didn't. And the U.S. could perform identical horrible actions around the world without the seemingly intentionally abrasive and arrogant foreign policy pronouncements which alienate our allies' populations. And why has the U.S. media and even governmental officials taking a liking recently to reporting on war prisoner abuse when they've never paid such close attention to it so close in time to it before? It's hard to believe that the sloppiness of 9-11, and these other items, are just due to the incompetence of those in charge, and so I speculate.

And for creepiness, get this, Ruppert also wants to inform us that because of "peak oil", "population reduction" is a necessity, the only question we have to decide, he told us all at the 911 Inquiry in San Francisco, is whether we want to do it "nice or nasty". When I asked him at the organized Q&A session afterwards, how does one do "population reduction" nice, I expected the same answer he had written about earlier: about how he advocated "the immediate convening of political/economic/spiritual/& scientific leaders from all nations . . . [to come up with] immediate steps to arrive at a crash program . . . to arrive at the best possible and most ethical program of population reduction" (http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr54.html)

Another mover and shaker, David Ray Griffin, is the author of the book, The New Pearl Harbor, beloved by many in the 911 Truth Movement as providing a definitive 911 skeptics account, even discussing various physical evidence claims pointing to 9-11 being an inside job. Writing his book's forward is Richard Falk. They're often a team, David Ray and Richard, both one world government aficionados (and I don't know about you, but I do admit to finding one world gov't advocates creepy) who work on the same projects and write for the same publications advocating a world government solution. Richard Falk, in fact, is a member of the CFR, the Council on Foreign Relations. He's worked on new world order projects for the CFR, like the World Order Models Project financed by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the Rockefeller Foundation. What the hell is one to make of a CFR member wanting to expose 9-11? Another frequent writing/project partner of Griffin is John Cobb, former senior economist for the World Bank. Griffin and Cobb founded the Center for Process Studies which received support from the Rockefeller Foundation. Griffin and Cobb have also co-authored some materials with Club of Rome member Herman Daly. Griffin, himself, referred to as the "well known theologian", has some unusual ideas about how humanity should think about God and apparently wants us to revert to some type of mysticism on our path to the new world order. Here's an interview of him talking about it: http://www.context.org/ICLIB/IC24/Griffin.htm

Byron has also published the book of another one world government promoter making the rounds in various 9-11 Truth Movement programs, Jim Garrison, president of the State of the World Forum. The book is entitled "America as Empire: Global Leader or Rogue Power?"

FYI - People have written me about the dead link to Jared Israel's 'debunking of Michael Moore' article, which I included below, http://emperors-clothes.com/moore.htm. The link now leads to the cited article. Sorry for the past inconvenience.

Jonathan | Sun, 01/25/2009 - 5:26am

Every action that is taken against the free people of the world is always a multifaceted attack. Now it is easier to accept the changes as they are given for seemingly good reasons. The public has been gradually pushed down a one way hall with fewer and fewer doors leading to answers and solutions. They had better wake up before it's too late. I fear it may already be too late for most of them.

Davol (not verified) | Sat, 01/24/2009 - 3:18am

The Elephant in the Room is that those planes did not bring down those buildings no matter how scientific NIST, or Popular Mechanic, or the BBC wants to try to sound while skating around the facts. David Ray Griffin has done an awesome job of documenting the case against the official conspiracy theory. Most people can do the basic physics in their head considering that all 3 buildings were completely reduced to less than 2 story piles of neatly chopped up central support columns and pillars, all at free fall speed in less than 12 seconds. If the planes brought the buildings down then at least the law of conservation of force would have slowed what happened down to maybe a few seconds more than free fall speed, and then there is the problem of all the concrete being pulverized into powder, and steel vaporized into clouds as well as melted into pools that stayed liquid for 2 months afterward. We Truthers are arguing about how hot Kerosene burns when the math in my head requires those upper floor fires to be closer to 10,000 degrees to make those neat piles of evidence that were so quickly whisked away forever. That is, unless you distribute that 10,000 degrees into explosives throughout the buildings and coordinate the explosions so that the lower building structure won't slow the collapse. Defenders of the 9/11 Commission story defend the real nut-case conspiracy theory here, and that BS has utterly failed to disprove the most likely explanation of why those 3 buildings came down, which is called CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.

Skimick (not verified) | Fri, 01/23/2009 - 5:32pm

The best 911 movie by far is 911 missing links. It shows how Jews were the main players in 911.....and other events.....Jews are ALWAYS involved, kick over a rock and see for yourself.

www.911missinglinks.com watch for free.

Made by www.prothink.org

Ricochet (not verified) | Fri, 01/23/2009 - 3:39pm

In the Truth Movement we all consider ourselves well versed in "TRUTH" matters, WTC7, Vigilant Guardian, Pentagon holes, who was where when and who knew what at what time. The big questiion is "what if?" What if everything you hold to be true is wrong? Think about this, Bush was a baffoon still is always will be. Cheney is just a prick. Osama Bin Laden is a dead patsy. Who then? Who had the infrastucture to pull off 9/11 and cover it up then launch a truth campaign to point at the bufoon a prick and a dead guy? It would be a classic triple cross. Bush, Cheney and OBL are off the stage now. To what benefit would they have for 9/11 now? The invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan have not produced any tangible results as far as stealing oil are concerned. Oil prices have gone from boom to near bust. Israel some say? More disinfo I am sure, yes the Mossad plays their parlour tricks in the middle east and spies on the U.S. but again not quite sure about them. The Illuminati and Freemasons if they exist as a "hidden power" would not need to pull a 9/11 to secure what would be thought of as already having the power. The Bush administation were set up to play a part and take the heat. The real truth will probably be more sinister than we ever thought. We too could be blinded by a truth so aweful that it is safer to think that those we can rationalize, did it. Ironic that the question "what if", came full circle to bite us on the ass! Roll that in your head for a while, come to grips with it and start to question 9/11 all over again. See you all on the various forums for further thoughts on this. We must learn to think beyond our perception of what we believe to find out the true perpetrators of 9/11.

James Taylor (not verified) | Thu, 04/22/2010 - 10:05am

I think it's pretty safe to assume that it was the U.S. Government along with Bush and Cheney who are responsible. The reason is just as obvious as that in any other common dispute of guilt. If they were truly inocent and knew they were then they would put effort into proving that. Such as when some of the already accussed people started popping up and were not dead then a truly incocent person would say shit, we need to find out who it was since it was not them. Well shit forget about that and just use some common sense. If they did not do it then they should be out their defending their reputation as US Government or least launch another investagation, or if a 767 really hit the pentagon then why dont they make public all the damned tapes that they took, shit at least it can prove what they're saying true. But they won't, they won't!! They are hiding shit. True only a guilty person has reason lie or something to hide.

George in Toronto (not verified) | Fri, 01/23/2009 - 2:30pm

Just like Moore,he never wanted to connect Israel. Here is the the under laying (lying) problem.The reason all the media skip the subject of Israel had a hand in it,is very simple.Did you notice all came to support of Israel in the bombing of Gaza or the relenting story telling of anti-semitsm--holowcaust, hollowcaust and that baloney!
Wake-up guys your blowing steam without any whistle.you can't compete with expert liars and con artists. Did you see the movie called Swindler's list--if not check out all the editors and chairmans of all the media--Joos :^(

id (not verified) | Sat, 01/24/2009 - 4:08pm

Very simple - Michael Moore's Hollywood agent is Rahm Emmanuel's brother.
Moore wants to keep "eating Lunch " in that town...

The puppet masters are past masters at this...

Business as usual in Washington then.


charlyn pinkey (not verified) | Wed, 12/15/2010 - 12:44am

The concept of this blog is awesome, Thanks for the share.

Mike D (not verified) | Fri, 01/23/2009 - 2:24pm

Don't forget about Mossad and 9/11, link):
Mossad and 9/11

Anonymous (not verified) | Mon, 12/22/2008 - 6:29pm

Checkout these 911 related film noirs:

AMERICAN COMBATANT "The Enemy Lies Within"

ABLE DANGER "The Truth is Darker Than You Think"

Anonymous (not verified) | Tue, 12/23/2008 - 11:55pm

Did you read the 9/11, What's Wrong With This Picture?

Perhaps you did not understand, Singer is suggesting the official story and the 911 truth story are not the real story.

The synopsis of abledanger indicates it is a fictional 911 truth story, is that true?

If so then you need to read singers piece again.
If not feel to post what abledanger suggests is the third story.

Anonymous (not verified) | Sat, 12/20/2008 - 2:53am

This makes a lot of sense. When I read about how the truth movement marginalized Judy Woods I knew there was something wrong. She may not be right about the laser weapon but I agree with her that Jones has only proven it was not a kerosene fire that brought down the buildings, he hasn't proven it was controlled demolition and no one in the "truth" movement will even consider their fair haired boy could be Misinformation.