U.S. is NOT in Any Position to Criticize Russian Elections!!!

Submitted by SadInAmerica on Mon, 12/12/2011 - 2:14pm.



* What's the reaction there to the Russian elections? We've heard a lot of statements that I think are way out of line from the US State Department, in particular Hillary Clinton. What's your opinion of those statements? ~ John Robles

An interview with Rick Rozoff, the manager of the Stop NATO website and mailing list and a contributing writer to Global Research.ca. Mr. Rozoff also worked "against the Chicago political machine" for approximately 25 years, from 1976-2000, including as: a ward-wide voter registration coordinator, the founder and leader of an independent ward organization, a congressional district coordinator for Mayor Harold Washington's 1987 reelection bid, a campaign manager in two state representative and one alderman election, and as a third party candidate for state office.

They are outrageous! They are unwarranted! Regardless of what the actual details are about the recently concluded Duma elections, parliamentary elections in Russia, the statements emanating, as you mentioned, from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and others, are arrogant to a degree.

If the situation were reversed and Russian and/or others major political figures in other nations commented similarly on US elections, which are not without their flaws as we can talk about, I hope, there would be the strongest possible protest from the State Department and the White House.

You know, statements by Clinton, for example that she has serious concerns about the elections on Sunday, presuming to speak on behalf of the Russian people, stating that Russian voters deserve, an I quote: "a full investigation of electoral fraud and manipulation." end quote.

This is somebody who is from the Chicago suburb of Park Ridge. And, like her commander-in-chief, Barack Obama, who is from Chicago and is a product of the Chicago political machine.

They are hardly in a position to complain about electoral fraud, and manipulation, and ballot box stuffing. They are products of the political machine that all but invented the process.

I've spoken with a fellow Chicago resident who had lived in the former Soviet Union and talked about the fact elections were held, where election days were holidays so that people were off work and could not only vote but could participate in the political process, including in the polling place, which is not a luxury accorded to Americans, though we hold ourselves up, of course, as being the model for democratic processes, including elections.

She (Clinton) made this statement about the recently concluded parliamentary elections in Russia, in State Duma and stated, mentioning again, in her own words, "electoral fraud and manipulation."

* What are some of the other flaws in the US system? Can you tell us something about foreign observers? Why aren't they allowed into the US?

The second question is particularly fascinating!

The first: "Their name is legion", to use the line from the Gospels. That is there are so many flaws in the American electoral system, not least of which of course is that next year several billion dollars are going to be spent by lobbyists and others to choose their candidates, buy their candidates into office, what is politely put an auction block.

I'll give you the best example I can think of. Today at work in Chicago most everyone were glued to television sets to learn which sentence was going to be passed down on former Governor Rod Blagojevich on 18 counts of corruption. He was sentenced to 14.5 years, as it turns out. We have to recall his major transgression was trying to sell the Senate seat, of at the time incoming US President Barack Obama.

During the course of the initial trial, Blagojevich mentioned that he had had several phone calls with Rahm Emanuel - who is now the mayor of Chicago; at the time he was Chief of Staff of the White House - about just that, about selling, the Senate seat, or selling the right to appoint the successor to the incoming president of a country that President Obama in December of 2009 referred to as "the world's sole military superpower."

But it's tolerated in the US simply because the US is the US, what's referred to as "American exceptionalism," so that even though we have an electoral system tainted by billions of dollars changing hands as almost all offices go to the highest bidder. As to foreign observers, the US will not tolerate any intrusion on its own sovereignty - but will interfering in the grossest fashion imaginable in other peoples' internal political processes.

* Regarding NATO?

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen has recently presumed again to lecture Russia, just as Hillary Clinton does, on how Russia should conduct its elections.

Rasmussen is telling Russia, though he is in no formal position to do so, how to defend itself, saying for example that Russia should not follow up on the pledges and on some of the actual commitments made by President Medvedev to increase surveillance radar and other surveillance installations in North-East Russia and to reposition tactical missiles in both Kaliningrad Enclave near North-East Russia and so forth.

But the statement by Rasmussen was particularly condescending and patronizing, at one point basically telling the Russian government they'd better take care of their own people first, or words to that effect, again just reeking of arrogance and contempt.

This sort of talk one expects from a NATO chieftain and Rasmussen, though less abrasive than some of his predecessors, feels empowered evidently to tell major nations like Russia what they ought to and ought not to do in terms of defending the borders of their own country.

I should add that the current US permanent representative to NATO, Ivo Daalder, made a statement two days ago where he said the US and NATO are forging ahead with the interceptor missile system in Europe, and I believe I am quoting him word for word: "whether Russia likes it or not."

* He said that?

That's correct. If anything, we are hearing more and more ambitious plans. For example, the Upper House of the Romanian Parliament, their Senate, yesterday ratified the agreement of the US to station 24 anti-missile -3 interceptors in Romania, which as we know is immediately across the Black Sea from Russia.

This is in conjunction with the comparable deployment of missiles in Poland in addition to the Patriot Advanced Capability-3 missiles that are already present in Poland; the radar missile defense facility that will be placed in Turkey.

There is a discussion now about maybe in the dozens, maybe in the scores of NATO nations' warships being converted to the so-called Aegis combat system so that they could be equipped with either radar or in most instances missiles, Standard Missile-3s for what's called the European Phased Adaptive Approach, a US-NATO missile system.

So they are forging ahead at all fronts, at the same time the Secretary General of NATO is lecturing Russia on what it should or should not do in terms of self-defense.

The US Ambassador to NATO, who is a pretty influential person in his own right - he is a former senior fellow with the Brookings Institution, I am talking about Daalder of course - who could make such a curt and arrogant statement, as the one I just cited, you know: that the US and NATO are going ahead with the missile shield "whether Russia likes it or not."




John Roble - December 8, 2011 - VoiceOfRussia


Big mouth Hillary just can't mind her own business... Election fraud!... There is so much election fraud in the US, it's a disgrace to the American people! We are a disgraceful, embarrassing example to the entire world on the subject of fair and honest elections.

Two-faced Power-Trip Hillary is the Queen of Election Fraud and Manipulations! Her big mouth spewing about Russia or any nation over their election process is appalling!

Oooooo that despicable... woman!

That's my 2cents! ~ SadInAmerica


Tag this page!
Submitted by SadInAmerica on Mon, 12/12/2011 - 2:14pm.