Millions Inflicted with Curable Cancer are Killed by Big Pharma and Chemotherapy

Submitted by SadInAmerica on Fri, 03/04/2011 - 4:46pm.



Cancer doesn't cause severe nausea and vomiting, chemotherapy causes that. Cancer doesn't cause complete hair loss, chemotherapy causes that. Cancer doesn't cause severe diarrhea or constipation and mouth sores, chemotherapy causes those side effects.

Chemotherapy has been proven to cause all of these side effects and have many longer-term consequences. Chemotherapy can permanently affect the heart, lungs, reproductive organs, nerves or other parts of the body.

Although chemotherapy is widely used to treat (not kill or cure) cancer cells it most often affects parts of your body not directly affected by the cancer itself.

This undesired result is referred to as a complication of treatment, or a side effect of the treatment. Millions of people don't die of cancer they die as a result of a complication of treatment, or side effect(s) of the treatment.

Doctors have been urged to be more cautious in offering cancer treatment to terminally-ill patients as chemotherapy often does more harm than good.

"If cancer specialists were to admit publicly that chemotherapy is of limited usefulness and is often dangerous, the public might demand a radical change in direction—possibly toward unorthodox and nontoxic methods, and toward cancer prevention. …The use of chemotherapy is even advocated by those members of the establishment who realize how ineffective and dangerous it can be." - Ralph W. Moss, author, The Cancer Industry

The National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) found that more than four in ten patients who received chemotherapy towards the end of life suffered potentially fatal effects from the drugs, and treatment was "inappropriate" in nearly a fifth of cases.

In a study of more than 600 cancer patients who died within 30 days of receiving treatment, chemotherapy caused or hastened death in 27 per cent of cases, the inquiry found.

Former chemotherapy patient Anne explains in the book, The Cancer Prevention Diet: "My mind rebelled at the thought of another six months of that poison. On several occasions, the doctor couldn't perform chemotherapy treatments on me because my white blood cell count was dangerously low. I promised my body I would not undergo any further chemotherapy treatments."

Anne's account reflects the feelings of all too many cancer patients who have suffered through months of often debilitating chemotherapy. The side effects that chemotherapy patients feel and others see - the extreme nausea and vomiting, the hair loss, the weight loss - are indicative of the intense havoc that chemotherapy is causing within the body.

According to the Life Extension Foundation, chemotherapy drugs are "cytotoxic," meaning that "they kill cells that are extremely active." Cancer cells are, of course, extremely active. However, so are the cells of the hair and the immune system, for example, which accounts for chemotherapy's destructive side effects.

As if these side effects are not enough, cancer therapy commonly includes surgery and radiation, both of which have their own dangers and side effects. As Professor Null writes in his Complete Encyclopedia of Natural Healing, "The mainstream medical establishment often prescribes mastectomy, radiation and chemotherapy to treat cancer, an approach that has been described as a slash-and-burn strategy."

The treatment for breast cancer is unfortunately often the general rule among cancer treatment - cut off the affected organ, poison the body with chemotherapy and then harm the body even more with radiation.

In Get Healthy Now, Professor Null describes one woman's experience with mainstream medicine's approach to breast cancer treatment: "Three days later, she had her breast lopped off.

That was followed up with lots of chemotherapy. Her hair fell out and she vomited 24 hours a day. She couldn't keep any food down. Then they did radiation and her skin burnt up and two of her ribs broke." He concludes, "Most people don't know how dangerous radiation is. I had seen enough. I wouldn't touch any of that medicine with a 10-foot pole."

Surgical removal of the cancerous body part also has its own aftereffects, of course, requiring not only the normal recovery after any surgery, but also coping with the psychological effects of having a body part removed.

As cancer patients suffer from the side effects of chemotherapy and other methods of mainstream cancer treatment, the fact remains that according to many medical practitioners, these treatments are unnecessary and sometimes do more harm than good.

In response to chemotherapy's many side effects, Dr. Atkins says in Burton Goldberg's Alternative Medicine, "Only in situations in which chemotherapy is proven to be effective and curative would I recommend it. In general, this might be testicular cancer."

Many people also think that surgery can sometimes do more harm than good: Biopsy, for example, may in fact spread cancer cells, according to Professor Null. Furthermore, the most extreme example of unnecessary cancer therapy - treatment for false positive cancer diagnoses - is more common than we'd like to believe, according to Critical Condition authors Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele.

One of the major drawbacks of chemotherapy treatment for cancer is that it not only attacks cancer cells, but other fast-growing, healthy cells, including those found in the bone marrow and other parts of the immune system. So being so destructive why continue to use these types of treatments? The answer is "Money".

There is big money in cancer research and treatment. The survival of the cancer research society depends on no cure being found against cancer. They rely on the $billion income from the government in the form of research grants and from the $billions in donations from the public.

Society is so desperate for a cure that they unwittingly hand over $billions to a group of people who have no intention of ever finding a cure. What reason would they have to simply take the money and not find a cure?

If there was a cure found, or at least declared found, every money hungry research lab around the World would close down.

If there was a cure for cancer the radiology wing of every hospital around the World would close down.

If there was a cure pharmaceutical companies (the modern day dope dealers) would be put out of business.

Since 1946 it is said that the American Cancer Society has invested over $2 billion in research trying to find a cure. Cancer spending in 1990 was $27 billion.

In 2008, this figure increased over 3 times to a whopping $90 billion. This massive increase in spending is caused by the rapidly increasing costs of new drugs (drugs manufactured for prolonged treatment only - not a cure), robotic surgeries and radiation procedures (life threatening treatment - not a cure), and the increasing number of people being diagnosed with an fraudulently declared incurable cancer.

$90 billion is being wasted on research and treatment because cancer has many cures - all natural, all safe, all available for as little as a few dollars, and all have been proven time and again.

If, as many people believe, mainstream cancer treatment is ineffective and always harmful to the body as a whole, then what is the alternative?

Alternative cancer cures are presented and validated every day. Articles are published every day declaring many safe and effective alternative cancer treatments and cures.

Articles with headlines like...

Science proves that garlic kills cancer cells,

Curry Powder Ingredient Kills Cancer Cells

In Tests, Vitamin D Shrinks Breast Cancer Cells - ABC News

Curry spice "˜kills cancer cells"˜ - BBC

How spicy foods can kill cancers - BBC

Substance in breast milk kills cancer cells, study suggests

Nano-protein pair kill cancer cells

Grape extract kills cancer cells - BBC

Scientists use salmonella bug to kill cancer cells - Reuters

Human cells secrete protein that kills cancer cells: Study

Vitamin C confirmed to kill cancer cells...

What are all these articles saying? They are stating that cancer can easily be beaten. They are stating the obvious fact that there are many cures for cancer - all of them natural. These articles all suggest and then verify that cancer cells are very weak, far weaker than healthy cells.

It is very easy to kill cancer cells if you can create the right environment. Research scientists have known for decades that your body is itself a cancer cell killer. A naturally produced protein found in the human body is able to zero in on and kill cancer cells, without the use of chemotherapy drugs.

The health care industry knows this.

The pharmaceutical companies knows this. Even your government knows this.

The only people who don't know this is you. If you did, you or someone you know wouldn't be dying of cancer.


December 13, 2011 -


Tag this page!
Submitted by SadInAmerica on Fri, 03/04/2011 - 4:46pm.