Obama... 'Other Two Branches of Government Irrelevant'!?!

Submitted by SadInAmerica on Mon, 02/15/2010 - 3:45pm.

Baffled over his inability to get his BOSS's agenda passed; despite unstoppable majorities in both houses of Congress, President Obama has determined that America can get along just fine without three branches of government. (Still not worried about living under a dictatorship?... Start worrying! ~ S.I.A.)

"With much of his legislative agenda stalled in Congress, President Obama and his team are preparing an array of actions using his executive power to advance energy, environmental, fiscal and other domestic policy priorities."

Now that the American citizenry has made itself utterly clear in its collective repudiation of the Soros-Obama agenda, the president is prepared to act on his own without meddlesomeness by Congress or the bothersome American people.

Former ballerina, Rahm Emanuel confirms that the White House is reviewing a list of executive orders and directives "to get the job done across a front of issues."

The New York Times is concerned, not about a tyrant in the White House, but that overreaching executive orders could leave Obama open to criticism and be subject to future challenges in Congress:

"But Mr. Obama has to be careful how he proceeds because he has been critical of both Mr. Clinton's penchant for expending presidential capital on small-bore initiatives, like school uniforms, and Mr. Bush's expansive assertions of executive authority, like the secret program of wiretapping without warrants. "

Apparently, the allegedly Harvard trained Constitutional scholar was absent the day they taught about separation of powers.

"The role of the President under the U.S. Constitution is not to make laws, but simply to execute the laws passed by Congress. Article I, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution begins: "˜All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States.' If the Constitution mandates that "˜all' law-making powers reside in the Congress, then it stands to reason none is left for the President. The President's job is that "˜he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed' under Article II, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution. "

In other words, the job of the chief executive is to ensure that laws made by actual law makers are carried out

Obama has already used his State of the Union address to bushwhack the Supreme Court in his efforts to caponize the judicial branch.  Granted, presidents often take issue with court rulings but they don't launch full scale strikes:

"First, he attacked the members of the Supreme Court directly, knowing they would be unable to respond.  This does not make him gutsy - it makes him a bully.  Second, he totally and purposefully misread their decision in order to rabble-rouse.  Even FDR did not do that."  Would that the Commander in Chief show such fortitude against our enemies.

Obama's plan is to use the time that the senate is in recess to make a slew of appointments;  no doubt we will see the kind of same superb nominees to which we have become accustomed who, like the president himself, couldn't qualify for the lowest level security clearance.

As his fellow Democrats try to separate themselves from their president; Obama is ready to rule the country by executive proclamation.

Joy Tiz - February 15, 2010 - source CanadaFreePress

Tag this page!
Submitted by SadInAmerica on Mon, 02/15/2010 - 3:45pm.