'Constitution? Are You Serious?... Are You Serious?'... Pelosi (Dumb as a Doornob!...)

Submitted by SadInAmerica on Mon, 10/26/2009 - 3:07pm.



When CNSNews.com asked House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Thursday where the Constitution authorized Congress to order Americans to buy health insurance--a mandate included in both the House and Senate versions of the health care bill--Pelosi dismissed the question by saying: "Are you serious? Are you serious?" (Is she for real? What's the matter with this woman? ~ S.I.A.) ~ Audio 

Pelosi's press secretary later responded to written follow-up questions from CNSNews.com by emailing CNSNews.com a press release on the "Constitutionality of Health Insurance Reform," that argues that Congress derives the authority to mandate that people purchase health insurance from its constitutional power to regulate interstate commerce.

The exchange with Speaker Pelosi on Thursday occurred as follows:
CNSNews.com: "Madam Speaker, where specifically does the Constitution grant Congress the authority to enact an individual health insurance mandate?"
Pelosi: "Are you serious? Are you serious?"
CNSNews.com: "Yes, yes I am."
Pelosi then shook her head before taking a question from another reporter. Her press spokesman, Nadeam Elshami, then told CNSNews.com that asking the speaker of the House where the Constitution authorized Congress to mandated that individual Americans buy health insurance as not a "serious question."
"You can put this on the record," said Elshami. "That is not a serious question. That is not a serious question."

Currently, each of the five health care overhaul proposals being considered in Congress would command every American adult to buy health insurance. Any person defying this mandate would be required to pay a penalty to the Internal Revenue Service.
In 1994, when the health care reform plan then being advanced by President Clinton called for mandating that all Americans buy health insurance, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office studed the issue and concluded:
"The government has never required people to buy any good or service as a condition of lawful residence in the United States. An individual mandate would have two features that, in combination, would make it unique.

First, it would impose a duty on individuals as members of society. Second, it would require people to purchase a specific service that would be heavily regulated by the federal government."
Later on Thursday, CNSNews.com followed up on the question, e-mailing  written queries for the speaker to her Spokesman Elshami. 

"Where specifically does the Constitution authorize Congress to force Americans to purchase a particular good or service such as health insurance?" CNSNews.com asked the speaker's office.

"If it is the Speaker's belief that there is a provision in the Constitution that does give Congress this power, does she believe the Constitution in any way limits the goods and services Congress can force an individual to purchase?" CNSNews.com asked. "If so, what is that limit?"
Elshami responded by sending CNSNews.com a Sept. 16 press release from the Speaker's office entitled, "Health Insurance Reform, Daily Mythbuster: "˜Constitutionality of Health Insurance Reform.'"  

The press release states that Congress has "broad power to regulate activities that have an effect on interstate commerce. Congress has used this authority to regulate many aspects of American life, from labor relations to education to health care to agricultural production."
The release further states:

"On the shared responsibility requirement in the House health insurance reform bill, which operates like auto insurance in most states, individuals must either purchase coverage (and non-exempt employers must purchase coverage for their workers)—or pay a modest penalty for not doing so.

The bill uses the tax code to provide a strong incentive for Americans to have insurance coverage and not pass their emergency health costs onto other Americans—but it allows them a way to pay their way out of that obligation.  There is no constitutional problem with these provisions."



Matt Cover - October 23, 2009 - source CNSNews


Tag this page!
Submitted by SadInAmerica on Mon, 10/26/2009 - 3:07pm.


Truth Seeker (not verified) | Tue, 10/27/2009 - 12:15am

Pelosi should be drug tested.

This is clearly a woman who is brain dead.

Do we need any further proof that idiots are
currently in charge of our lives and we have no say
about it anymore? No we do not, just open your eyes.

90% of them are either idiots, or criminals.
So what are we gonna do about it?

How many Lawyers out there will pool resources
to stand up for our rights?
How many OATH KEEPERS are in your city?
How many Citizens are willing to network to save this country (and each other)?
How many of our Military children will stand down if, and when, they are ordered
to violate the civil rights of your family (and theirs)?

I'm hoping for MILLIONS.. How bout you?

I'm tired of being told we have to kill each other.

Is there another species on this planet that destroys their own species?

We have grown in the wrong direction and we are wasting good technology on bad decisions.

Let's put all government officials in a ring and let them fight their own battles.

Without them, more of us will survive, and we can work toward peace and prosperity....
FOR ALL. Thats what we the people want.

We want our free Republic back.

Anonymous (not verified) | Sun, 11/01/2009 - 12:58am

This lady is not fit to serve our Country. We need to impeach her along with Obama.