walter Kelliher (not verified) | Mon, 02/22/2010 - 6:26am

Are they not first answerable to the constitution then the President? That would mean if the President tells them to do something unconstitutional such as violating the Dick act of 1902, by disarming the people, they are not constitutionally required to follow an unconstitutional order there by illegal even from the president?


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.